The Direction of Coaching | #PERSPECTIVES
Join Sharon as she delivers her keynote talk at the ICG Annual Coaching Summit. She dives into a BRAND NEW model and theory of coaching, where the industry is headed and the standards we're bringing to it. Tune in at 22 mins to discover her new theory of coaching.
Sharon Pearson: Hey I'm Sharon Pearson and I really want to thank you firstly so much for joining me on the perspectives journey and your feedback is so appreciated.
I'm so pleased that you're digging it. Please send in any questions you have about topics around different human perspectives that you'd love me to chat about. Coming up in this perspectives episode we have something a little different for you and I'm looking forward to sharing it with you at different times throughout the year I am fortunate enough and privileged enough to be able to present live in one of our training rooms here at the Coaching Institute Campus which means I'm in front of a studio of people wonderful coaches people who are interested in coaching methodologies who are simply passionate about being their very best selves and we have cameras everywhere.
It's one of the perks of having this beautiful campus and all the technology and the phenomenal team we have says cameras everywhere we capture it. We thought what better give to bring you today in this perspectives episode was a snippet from one of those trainings where I dive deep into an expert to human behaviour that I believe will really give you phenomenal value so you get to see me live.
It'll be either an online recording or it could be me live in front of an audience. Either way it's going to be an aspect of how we can rock out at this thing called life in a way that has deep meaning for ourselves because that's what this is all about. It's your perspective on a phenomenal life. So enjoy the show you may find a different time so I mentioned different things that aren't on camera. Use your imagination to fill in the gaps. Mostly however the narrative will unfold in a way that will make sense and I trust you get great value from. I look forward to your feedback and I hope if this goes well we get to bring you more shows from live events that we do here at the campus here in Melbourne Australia.
Good morning everybody. How are you? Wow. Throwing things at me from the audience is a, four stars. Glam is the sound coming through okay. Wonderful. So thank you for coming.
I think it's why hello it's so great that you're here. How wonderful are you getting value from it? Yes well I mean next to you you have 300 people here. So good start Matt and I we're just saying it should be 300 people we should have some booze out there and rotating and workshops in different rooms. What do you think? And who’s seeing perhaps they may be delivering one of those workshops. Yeah don’t you think Matt should be having little workshops going brainstorming things like that? I think it’ll be wonderful.
So I'm here today to have a chat about what is most valuable to you. There are a couple of things I'd like to slot in there as well. Firstly in 2020 we're moving the school TCI more towards evidence base. You guys have heard about that. So it's old news to you. Yeah you’re all over it.
Audience: Yesterday’s news
S: Yesterday's news that's almost old.
So we're going to start incorporating into it positive psychology CBT cognitive behavioural therapy what else solution based coaching strengths based coaching family therapy coaching yes there's a lot coming next year now.
It's great isn't it? So by the end of next year Matt and I are anticipating that the assessments will be upgraded and incorporating all of this as well. So it’ll become a benchmark. So we want the whole school to have that. Which means I’m going to take over advanced skills so I can start teaching what I’ve been studying? So that's the reason I want to move into advanced skills who's going to be joining me in advanced skills. Okay good. So I won’t be alone which would be weird. I'm. Going to run it twice next year and after that just annually and with the goal that Matt's going to want to be involved with that as well. He's doing lots of work in the same area.
So in advanced skills we're going to start introducing strengths based coaching solution based coaching positive psychology and coaching just a whole bunch of stuff that's going to flip the lid on how you approach coaching because I know we've done stacks of work in emotional world stacks of work in the quest work and now I want to make sure it's we will make sure it's really balanced. So both messages are there because we think they're both important to coaching. How does that sound. Good good good. I'm really pleased.
Are they ready for the other announcement Matt Glam Matt Glam Matt? Matt. Glat? I don’t do that. No not glat the bit about the other things that are. Shall I say anything about the.
The Meta Two, the Meta Two. Do I?
So we're also moving towards evidence more evidence based in Meta Two as well. So for those of you in pro coach the what you get and some you're getting Meta Two to separately we're going to move those five days to become more. It's already evidence based because the Meta profile is evidence based but there's other things we can teach you in there as well. So that's going to become radically different over the next two years the next one will probably remain reasonably consistent but we're looking to upgrade that as well. How does that sound.
Yeah. So we're just really wanting to. And then you’ll see the changes online as well. Now that's going to take at least three years. This is thousands of barrels of content needing to be reviewed. We've had some people post online they're interested in your researches we haven't got their CVs yet but I hope when get them and we can start finding a team of people to work with me Matt and glam and start making the whole thing evidence based. I'm not reviewing all that material solo and if I did it’d be a 10 year project so I need help. So asking me when it's going happen. Just ask me how many researches I've got. Does that make sense? Because it really is beholden on us getting people around us who are willing to do the research and understand what research methodology means and then can summarize the research and explain how our content links to research.
So that's coming which will be great. Yeah I know it's fantastic. It's a lot of work. So if you know good researchers you're prepared send a CV please let them know that we would love to have a conversation and because we need a team it's not can't just be me and one assistant waiting for me to tell them what to do. It needs to be a go getter who understands they’re going to take practitioner and map at all across to the research in all those fields not just one field. So it's not just evidence based coaching also positive psychology CBT family therapy and so it goes in so many fields you can draw I was listening to a podcast this morning which did my head in and I'm not going to include this in the research base we're moving towards but um time and space is no longer considered in physics the basis of our experience.
I'm going home to lie down I know what you're doing but. So you know we always say time and space is the basis of reality. Well and physicists have well physicists have you might know better than them but physicists have. And now the latest out of physics and maths so not philosophy and not Deepak Chopra having a view that sounds very quanty but the science is saying that time and space is not reality. I will not be including that in your assessment.
So apparently it's simply a representation of a deeper reality. Well everyone’s saying yes like you know what that means the physicist is saying they don't know what it means I'm telling and no one in this building knows what that means.
We can't the greatest minds in the world don't. They're only just starting to breach what that could mean not what we feel not what we sense not what we meditate you get what I’m saying the science and that's blowing my mind that is blowing my mind. What that means and what that means is the observer and what we think we're observing and how we can never observe someone else's consciousness and what does that say to coaching.
I can't possibly coach you I can encourage the representation of you and even my representation of you is flawed from the beginning because I believe you exist in that space right now.
Currently you don't. I'm. Just going to lay down. It's going to be laying down.
[Gestures to head] Voovoom voovoom voovoom. It's too early to drink. That's what they're telling me. It's never too early for drugs. I'm going to manage my way through this.
So there's fun stuff like that to consider when we're coaching who were being present to are we being present to ourselves or are we being present to the client but we're never present to the client because the client just shifted who they are just then so we’re never actually. And we've just changed just then so we are never being present to each other. We're only present to effect simile of each other.
Now if that doesn't do your head in it should. If you think it's not you're not being smart enough about it. Do you get that if you're being relaxed about like yeah sure, uh uh, that means you're not giving it enough thought because it's worthy your of thought. That means when you're with someone the way you think you're perceiving them is already wrong.
Now can we lay down?
A: Yes yes
S: Now now now, and I find that really I've got a lot of tea now. Because I perceive to in this time and space does that mean.
So this stuff should make us uncomfortable. I listen to Sam Harris a lot who here listens to Sam Harris. Well you should and he's just done a podcast which nobody is going to understand. Like they're already saying no one's understanding a word they’re saying. They’re understanding the “thes” and the “ands” but everything else is and their names we believe we understand their names but he's just literally put out a podcast with one of most eminent physicists in the world talking about this and saying with great humility we don't understand this. So we are all going to be on the page if that's okay with you.
We don't understand this because the greatest minds can't buy what I can glean out of it is I should really question who I think I'm speaking with not question them. Question who I think I'm speaking with. And if I do that then I got to start thinking about how I think about it and if I'm going to think about how I think about it then I got to think about how I think about thinking about it.
There's a logic to what I'm saying there is great humility on what I'm saying because it's not enough to think I don't know who I'm speaking with because your realities change you change you know now what are you going to do with that is not interesting just to say who I speak I'm speaking with just changed and who I think you are just change in how I know who I am in seeing you just change therefore we're never seeing each other. Good to know. It's a magic trick. What do you do about it in a coaching session? How do you translate that into something you can operationalise? How do you turn it into an action or sequence of actions?
But given there's no time it's not a sequence. Now the other thing that challenge is cause and effect.
Okay. Soluble aspirin right now. They’re questioning cause and effect because you question time there's no cause then effect.
I know yeah I know it's but we don't know what to replace it with yet. So the argument is it's the simplest way to represent what apparently is going on. No one understands yet so we don't understand it. But it's not cause and effect. It's simply a web of experiences that have already occurred. How do you operationalise that in coaching now?
I don't have the answers but I reckon it's worth pondering questions. What do you think? Yeah.
A: I'm just wondering if in establishing a rapport with the client I'm just wondering if establishing a rapport with the client and having a deep intimate connection somehow transcends the unreal world.
S: Okay. So what they say about that and they literally talk about two people's consciousness they're saying that your consciousness next to my consciousness which neither is a compact neither of us can perceive. So they estimate we perceive one percent of our consciousness so the one percent of my consciousness I think and tell myself kid myself and pretend I'm aware of along with your 1 percent that you pretend you think you're aware of that somehow translates into a new consciousness.
I'd agree with it that up to that point. It’s the one percent that somehow interacts and forms something new
A: Should we be worried too much about this if what we do works.
S: No, should be worried about, I never suggested worrying. I would never say worry I say a true playful delight and adventure and I don't know what to do with it yet mate. That's the fun.
A: I love the adventure
S: But I love the adventure. There’s never a worry. It's simply so if my 1 percent showed up this way and your 1 percent showed this way. Firstly we're already incredibly inaccurate already incredibly inaccurate which is why I have so much trouble with social media and when someone bags out someone because they made a mistake. So we're bagging out our 1 percent that we're aware of thinks we can judge their 1 percent.
They just did where they made a mistake and that does not sum up the 99 percent. They're not even aware of but it sided with they’re a bad person.
That's where I think we should worry because the way it's been weaponised and that to me is a worry. But in terms of us coaching I think it's pure delight wonder and adventure and it's a wonderful dance and to think that I'm in any way coaching you is hilarious. And for you to believe I'm coaching you fall down laughing and that to me is the adventure because we're not.
It's not a coaching relationship with each other. It's simply those two 1 percents got together and somehow formed a different version of the 2 percent. That's all that's happened. But the other 99 percent hasn't. Hasn't changed.
A: and yet it works.
S: And yet it works and it's enough
A: It is enough.
S: So yes I love your thought again. I would. The worry is when we use this to weaponise against others and that's one thing I won't have at TCI in our communities as you guys know. The one thing I'm fierce about and will never apologize for moderating out groups the way Teash does. The way our team does because the moment it's used to weaponized judge belittle or think that someone can't make a mistake and still be human and wonderful is to deny 99 percent of what we're not even being aware of. So. Well we’re not aware of 100 percent of that person. I think I'm aware of your 1 percent but I'm just telling myself that.
A: So am I
S: So maybe I'm just coaching myself. I'm going to need something stronger.
Thank you. It's really interesting discussion. The reason I think these kinds of discussions are worthy of coaches is because one of the things I want to teach you guys next year is existential coaching which is what I've also been getting trained in and this is an existential conversation. It is literally discussing what is this and does this matter and if it matters what the fuck do you do with it. Now that is the heart of wonderful coaching on any day. So I think more of these discussions are important and make us more well-rounded coaches.
And then I'll go further and I'll come to you and then I'll say I don't think we can coach existentially like what is the meaning of life the universe and everything. If we're not taking that journey ourselves. So to have this discussion is very important to. You can't sit passively by and have a conversation about the meaning of life and the meaning of what's the point of my existence.
If you're not willing to have the discussion and then say you're trained in that type of coaching you're not because it's definitely my. I've got to put under a microscope my 1 percent. And to ask you to do that. Does that make sense. So it's very much a discussion that's worthy of having. Yeah
So when we're talking about judging the 1 percent and your 1 percent. Yeah my 1% percent I’m gonna judge that 1 percent. Hilarious already. Yeah. So where does that leave you when you are talking about the people around you that are good for you and bad for you.
Well there's good for me and there’s bad for me and it doesn't have to be judgment. There's a difference between judgement in judgement. Well isn't there. I can judge someone because I've decided they're bad and boo. But I can show good judgment.
S: And say yeah it ain't working for me right now where my one percent showing up right now. That's not probably going to be a good match. So there’s judgment in judgment. Does that make sense. I'm talking about where the worry is is where it's used as judgment to point a finger and not remember there are three people pointing right back. It's that what I'm talking about to show good sense to make good decision is completely separate is what I'm discussing. Yeah it's cool. We now have two definitions minimum of judgment in this time and space.
A: Which doesn't exist.
S: Which doesn’t exist. Did yesterday. It was fine. 10:00 this morning I had time and space. Now I've got nothing.
S: Isn’t it cool. It's really cool. So that's the kind of place we're going to next year along with the science. So it’s all theory it's not science yet but it's heading to where they're building some mass models for it that I'll never teach and I'll never look at. I can assure you of that right now if you're worried. But other part of it there is some research behind it we're going to start bringing that and combining it how’s that sounding as a year.
A: It’s exciting
S: The other thing I think that we need to really look at were you guys expecting to take notes and then go away and do three actions with me I can do that. But it's just not my thing is that alright. I could ask you to mind my beautiful shoes which I believe do exist in this time and space.
A: I love them
S: Far more important than existential coaching I think you're right. The other thing I think coaching needs to start considering as an industry or as a body or whatever. Not just the research which is kind of limited and questionable. But improving not greatly but improving.
Is where we do we draw our knowledge from you know do we draw from psychology. Do we draw it from sociology. Do we draw from family therapy. Do we draw it from. I mean where do we draw out questions from where is the limit the number of times I get asked when I do an event with people who don't know me and they see me do my thing they say what’s the difference between what you've just done and therapy and I don't know the line and I don't and should I. And I don't have the answer.
Because I'm just being me my 1 percent showing up with that knowledge and the ability to hold that moment so you know a lot of you will criticise and not me but they will criticise some coach saying it's looking a lot like therapy. You just don't have the bit of paper. Where's the line when is it not a coaching question a therapy question when is it not a therapy question. How am I doing here.
To me it's all therapy questions. It's not so I'm doing therapy but if I ask a client for example what are you gonna to do with that. I know that exists in counseling is a standard question. I know exists in psychology I know exists in therapy I know exists in family therapy and couples therapy. So where's my line and where should the line and should there be a line and is this a reasonable criticism and should we do anything about it. There are the questions I'm consuming the TCI are these questions we need to answer. Do we need do I need to defend my right to ask a therapy based question that was drawn from therapy I'm using in a coaching context.
Now I know the lines really easy to say well I don't work with clients who are diagnosed I don't work with clinical populations I work with non-clinical populations but still therapy questions and so I'm delighted by what I'm going to do with that and how I'm going to bring the evidence and how these researchers are going to bring the evidence in to show. I want to show how these questions can be valid the way I want to look at it is this I think I don't know yet I'm going to big board. You can't stop me. I don't know if what I'm writing is worthy of the Big Board but the big board doesn't exist so it's fine.
I think and I haven't got there yet. So bear with me this will happen over the next year or so. I want to develop this theory of coaching that is inclusive of this conversation and this is the way I think about it. And I'd love your input and help me shape it.
It's not landed I certainly haven't hit the back of the box yet by a long shot but if below the axes are the things that are in our past let's say past is here I've never done this before let's see if I can work it out if past is below the axes and future is above the axes over here we now have two finite points we now we can focus on the past we can focus on the future obviously this will be the now point then I think and I don't know but I think this is how I coach that this is looking at healing and this is looking at building this is how my brain works when I coach and train and traditional coaching would say what what would pure coaching theorists say that’s it and you'd say pure therapy with the hope of improving that. What do you think
I believe the way my head's working for theory of coaching is that it’s the most accurate template that I've got now when I watch what coaches do. I think I'm working on it and this is part of my thinking.
Who knows strength based coaching okay so strengths based coaching is your work with. And there’s research to support it. Same as there’s research to support the value of healing so strengths based coaching would be what are you great at the client tells you. How can you apply what you’re great at to what you're doing now.
Basically who's ever been so miserable the thought of being asked what they’re great at sends them back to bed. So there's a time and a place if you'd asked me 17 years ago what I was great at. I would if said being miserable and alone and disconnected and unavailable I would’ve said they were things I was great at. So how useful is that question to someone who is like that.
A: It adds more anxiety
S: It adds more anxiety. Did someone say something. Yeah. Don't apologise. Yeah that's true.
A: I remember the first time you said that to me
S: I know I punched you.
A: Never again
S: Wonderful times.
A: Yes anxiety. However would it not highlight where you're at like when you realised what you were great at and you regret you. Oh my God. That's what I'm good at. Wouldn't that question.
S: Yeah except strengths based coaching isn't meant to be utilised as like that. It's meant to be operationalised through listing actual strengths. And there's 24 of them.
S: And you're meant to pull from the list and I would’ve looked to list blankly and going. That's not me. Makes sense? Yeah
A: For me what comes up, not just anxiety if you were to ask someone a question of what they're good at and they're in that space of I suck and it could put them into even more self judgement and self deprecation.
S: Totally, totally, absolutely
A: And they could potentially end up in an even worse position than when they came in.
S: I agree with you. That's where I'm at. That's right. That's why I think we've got to look at the whole not just the part and there's someone's hand over here I mean if you're up for it. Go Amy
A: and that fits so beautifully into Matt’a session last night about the self image and that you know the walls go up and our ego’s like no don’t tell me that I’m good if I have this self image like. yes it's beautiful.
S: Yes, we can’t argue self image sorry if this to me is a framework that perhaps upgrades what we think coaching is. It's not well received because traditional coaching is only this and this it's just looking at the strengths and it says anybody that doesn’t know what their strengths are shouldn't be getting coaching. So they reckon they’re clinical client.
I think it's bullshit I was not a clinical client I was just somebody who was really down on myself with low self esteem that doesn't mean I qualify as clinical but a lot of people would argue it puts me in the clinical category that low self-esteem and I don't believe that. I think low self-esteem is part of the regular human condition that regular people can manage. I really do it doesn't if it doesn't need drug therapy you're all good. We can figure it out. So that's why I'm proposing this in that this is where I think meta dynamics is heading not landing. I haven't arrived yet. It's been six years seven years in the making but I think this is the whole person and then I could improve the axes in different ways and I'm open to feedback but any thoughts on that that perhaps we can have to consider or anything I've left out. Yeah.
A: I don't know why this comes into my head but it does. And the way that I see it is if you're coaching somebody and you're getting them to look from the future back at the past to see what they can positively take with them and what they want to change. How does that work with that.
S: Yeah. So that's a learning curve so all of this all of coaching. If all of coaching was something I believe it's about learning to improve learning for the purpose of improving life condition, life conditions and well-being. So that's coaching which I think it is still working on it. Any definition is good enough. I know of a thousand but my definition today is it's learning for the purpose of improving life conditions and my sense of well-being my well-beingness probably would switch around like the being before the having so I’m improving my well-beingness and life conditions then I'm going to draw from my past for the purposes of improving my wellbeing and life conditions as long as it's helpful. But I would also say I need to look to my past to heal the child that wasn't loved in that moment and only once I've done that can I turn it into the learning for my wellbeing now.
S: So I need to do the extra step below the line before you can invite me to go above the line and say this is how it helps me. It's not enough just to talk about the past. I think that's pointless.
A: Yeah yeah. It’s a hole isn’t it. It’s not either above nor below the line. It’s a hole
S: It’s a black hole Just. And this is what I think too many people do. Hang on, I’ll come to you. I think too many people get so caught up in the rumination and the self reflection and thinking about themselves. They think that's doing good but it's not it's harming because it's not done from the perspective of I am learning this for the purposes of improving my well-being and my life conditions. I'm just learning about me stop the emptiness of that the vacuous sense that it literally does lead to depression. There’s research for that. So I'm trying to add purpose to the reflection but I think it's a three step process. We've got to recall the reflection we've got to deal with a reflection which is still down here then we got to decide what are we gonna do with how we dealt with it to incorporate it into building our future.
So a lot of the time is going through all the steps and it could be you go through the steps and get to here and realise to make it part of the future you could never do that again and needs to be different. So I know someone who I can't remember who it is. It's a comment.
I've had a lot of conversations recently but oh yeah it’s them. Yeah. So. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah yeah. Yeah. So they were raised in such a way that. That their mother literally said I hate you when they said I love you. They said I hate you very obviously. You can predict the adult outcome. So in the past that happened they didn't do this and they're trying to build a future. I'm kind of thinking the models needed. Now. I'll go into a little bit more for you. They were told they were hated and they think their healing is by getting someone else to change.
And I'm looking at this going I’m not seeing that supported by this model. Does that mean I should change the model which is insane. Because no one has to change for my happiness or my well-being. Or do they need to change their thinking. And that's why I think this model could be useful for you guys as coaches because nowhere on this model does it say so specifically they experienced abuse which they haven't dealt with directly that they haven't healed them. They believe the pathways a lot of people do experience abuse. If that perpetrator gets what's coming to them they spent years trying to get what that person needs to get where's the focus internal or external.
S: Where that. And so but it's not. It's your future. It's not their future. This is applied to self not others and there's no way that person has to be a part of your future nor do they have to do what you want them to do and nor could you expect them to do it in fact they're probably going to deny you what you think you want to do after years of pursuing them simply because that is the nature of a perpetrator. How am I doing here to deny that they are a perpetrator is part of human nature. Ofcourse I'm not the antagonist I'm the victim all the time.
That's human nature so there is 17 years committed to getting this person to pay thinking it will heal them and build their future and it's not because they've had their day in court and it didn't change shit.
Now you've heard of endless stories like this so the way I'm framing that because I already know all this but I think this model helps frame that. I think this model will help you when you teach your clients well nowhere in there does it say someone else has to change for you to heal and build your future. All of this is in this. So I'd say that now dot is a self dot. How's that. It's self in the now. Now putting aside the podcast said there's no such thing as self.
Oh my God. I can’t go on. This is what I was listening to do before I came here and I wanted to teach you based on my what do I do.
There's no self there's no past there's no future and there's no now okay. There's nothing stop it. But anyway given we're going to work with the elements that we have. It’s self and now is at the centre nowhere does it say the world has to change. How am I doing here. So to me it's a very pragmatic model which is what I'm aiming for that I'm wanting to take the airy fairy crap out of it that some people can do which is aw. If they say if my mother apologies I'll be okay with its airy fairy that's technical speak airy fairy shit because they don't know they did anything wrong and if they did know it and if you don't like it justify it because who here’s anytime done anything wrong and then justified it. Well given that's human nature that everyone's justifying and rationalising every decision we made. Your mother's no different. So seeking her has stop rationalising even as you rationalise it impossible fucking possibility.
How am I doing here. Are you hearing it. The impossibility of rationalising if they apologize I'll be okay. Already that you've rationalised your need for them to do something. So you are now rationalising thinking your mother is not going to. Good luck. Yes. So the answer can't be that we bring faulty logic and expect somebody else to not use faulty logic. So this model is my attempt to. Okay. Let's just get down to the ground. This just get centred and actually do the work that's gonna help run the work that we think's gonna help us feel better.
How am I doing here. Thoughts. Oh a lot. Over to you Amy wherever the mic goes I will follow.
A: My brain feels like it's expanding so much at the moment from looking at this model
S: Yeah me too.
A: Like my head feels like it can't contain my brain right now.
S: it's going to leak.
A: Yeah and I've been sitting here trying to place like what I do in a process in this model
A: and I'm thinking I'm thinking and I'm thinking Okay we start to heal the past we open up some more possibilities to actually allow some room to think well what could my future self start to be. And then from the self in the now.
S: So grab that because if you heal some of that what you perceive as possible has to change.
A: That's true that's true.
S: Because consciousness just changed. '
A: And then I'm then thinking Well our job as a coach is to hold the space for both and kind of keep adjusting as the client adjusts. And then from whoever they are in the now in whatever moment that is in the coaching session they can start to make the past mean something else based on a choice they want to make on who they want to be in the future.
S: Great. Let’s take that and put it in the model as they build a new reality how they define and redefine this has to shift.
S: Good work. I love it. So you're implying a two way street. I like that. How we doing with that do we dare? It’s our black pen that doesn't exist. Keep going yeah dig it do that and implicit in what you're saying is we don't get addicted to any quadrant that's what you're hearing. Yeah you did that.
And are you hearing that implicit in this. Because a lot of us come into coaching for personal healing reasons but we can't then get bogged down in the healing if we're not balancing out this we're not progressing. If we accept my definition how’s that sitting with you because if we just keep staying in this we're not learning for our future. Well the technical word is wanking. Yes wherever you go next Amy I'm with you. Oh and I'm in your hands.
A: Yeah thanks, I'm just thinking that that just increases our flexibility in everything.
S: it should.
A: Not getting rigid in one spot.
S: Great. Good. And I believe that. So maybe it's a way of looking at a micro level a literal coaching session. Did you balance in this coaching session the four quadrants or if you stayed in one for a lot of the session are you balancing that over a series of sessions and it can form a help of rebalancing recalibrating where your attention needs to flow. Because remember you're only dealing with one percent of your consciousness you think you're aware of. And if you're 1 percent is addicted to past that has to show up in your coaching. And I want to include this eventually when we get to it.
This can become part of how Mentors give our coaches feedback. I expect coaches to coach all four in a session for assessment at different levels of competence based on practitioner advanced master and pro.
But I want to see them transcending the need to just what do you think that was about you know some past questions we could then come up with and then have a lot of fun. What was that about what was going on when did you decide that these are past questions. Then we can ask some healing questions. What would you have wanted to have said to yourself at the time. How would you have wanted your. How would you wanted your people to have been with you at that time differently. What is it you would want to say to that child now healing questions building questions What can you draw on based on what you've just learned that will enable you to approach this moment with more kindness and self compassion building questions future questions moving forward. How will you approach it differently next time. So it becomes its own sequence of coaching questions to build towards the definition of coaching. How am I doing. Are you seeing new connections.
S: Great. Does that satisfy where you were thinking to extent to which you are aware of what we're thinking.
A: The flexibility of being able to move into the past in the healing as well and not exclude that. But now having a sequence like a plan to move forward
A: Make sure you cover off every quadrant.
S: Yes. Yes. Fantastic.
Can we make sure Matt’s the room. Hearing this please because I expect him to teach it. Go for it Amy I’m not going to…
A: It’s just that my mind is wondering and going back to what you said earlier. Like now the new theories there's no time and space and no self and all that stuff.
S: All that stuff exactly.
A: Yeah. So I'm just thinking like so. So we talk about the past events and even yesterday becomes the past when we move in time and then
S: Now is the past. Now the past is the past. Yes.
A: It’s just so somebody who's had a past event and who's caught up in that event that past might be repeating like even yesterday before day before even and even now.
S: Yeah. because they haven't done what
S: They’re just stuck in
A: The past
S: or they're in the past thinking somebody else has to change. They can't move to there.
A: Yeah. So if you're thinking is like if there's no self you just your mind is just a spot a speck in somewhere in the universe.
S: way I don't know but okay sure
A: And whatever we look like it's just an avatar or whatever.
A: Just taking our space in mind how would we project to.